There are 36 combination of dice rolls
on each player's card. If a player hit .250 in real life, chances are
he'll have nine numbers on his card that result in a hit. Nine is
25 percent of 36. On the same token, if the player tends to strike
out more, as did Adam Dunn, Mark Reynolds or Reggie Jackson (Mr.
October once struck out five times in one game), he will see a
proliferation of “13s” — the strikeout result — on his card.
A home run hitter will have more “1s”
on his card, or “5s” and “6s,” which are home runs at times
with runners on base.
It all works out pretty well; the
players usually perform closely to what they actually did for that
particular season.
In the 1942 season I'm doing now, Ted
Williams is batting over .400 in late May. His card reflects that
type of season with plenty of hit numbers. But he began slowly. There
are ebbs and flows in this game that have balanced his season's stats
out. It's what makes APBA such a good game.
But then there are also anomalies that
pop up and completely disregard the statistical aspect of the game.
Some players, like in real life, get hot in the APBA game and play
well above their average. Others cool off and don't have the numbers
that they actually did in the real game.
I've seen this a lot. It's almost as if
the game takes a life of its own. I've heard other replayers refer to
it as “dice magic” for various players.
In my 1981 replay, for example, Richie
Zisk of the Seattle Mariners played far above his actual stats for
that season. It seemed like he was one of the greatest clutch hitters
in baseball, albeit playing for a horrible team. In my replay,
Seattle won only 55 or so games, but Zisk must have won
at least 10 with game-winning hits — mostly with walk-off home
runs. It happened enough for me to take notice.
The 1998 season I did, my first
baseball replay with APBA, Mark McGwire hit 70 home runs. I think
APBA should have included needles with performance enhancing drugs to
juice up he and Barry Bonds and, in my replay Greg Vaughan, who hit 58
for the Padres during that season.
On the inverse, in my 1957 replay,
Mickey Mantle was awful. In the real season that year, Mantle hit 34
home runs. In my game, he had 22. In the 1964 replay I did, Sandy
Koufax couldn't buy a win for the L.A. Dodgers and he ended up with a
record of something like 16-14. And in 1987, the entire Minnesota
Twins team didn't play up to their potential, finishing second in the
American League West Division 10 games behind Kansas City.
So, there are oddities in this game.
But that's what makes it worth playing APBA. You don't want everyone to
play exactly as they did in the real game. There'd be no surprises.
In the case of Ted Williams, I first
thought he would be the 1942 season underachiever. Of course,
Williams' underachievement is another player's career year. He began
slowly, hitting in the low .300s for the first 20 or so games for the
Red Sox. It was reflected in the standings as Boston quickly fell
behind the American League-leading Yankees.
But, as I was giving up hope for
Williams, he caught on fire. In his last 10 games, he has batted
.415, driven in 13 runs and hit six home runs and now leads the AL
with 10 homers. He also scored 11 runs and hit safely in nine of
those 10 games.
We roll the dice and log the stats on the
game sheet. For much of the time, our players
perform as we expect them to based on what we see on their game
cards. But then there are the times when someone gets hot and, like
Teddy Ballgame, throw the statistics out and we just go along with
the ride and watch what happens.